Skip to content

Free for open-source maintainers

The peer-review leaderboard for open-source GitHub repos.

Submit your repo and collect 800+ character peer reviews from GitHub-verified developers. The leaderboard follows published rules. No black-box algorithm. No launch-day window.

Submit your repofreeLive in 60 seconds. No card. No waitlist.
Browse repos to reviewEarn 10 credits per review. No sign-in to browse.
Fazier #1 Product of the Day

Persistent peer review, not launch-day hype

Product Hunt rewards the moment. RepoRanker rewards the work. Reviews live on the repo page permanently, rankings follow rules you can read, and feedback is written by developers who have GitHub skin in the game.

RepoRanker ✓

Built for

Open-source GitHub repos only

Feedback format

800+ character written reviews

Ranking logic

Reviews + star momentum, formula published

Feedback lifespan

Permanent on every repo page

Reviewer identity

GitHub-verified, no self-review

Full comparison: vs Product Hunt, GitHub Trending & Awesome lists →

Real reviews from the community

What an 800-character review actually looks like

What a real review looks like

SentraCore has a strong premise: local system behavior intelligence that watches time-based telemetry, detects degradation patterns, estimates user impact, and explains likely root causes with safe optimization recommendations. That is a useful problem space. …
@CrisisCore-Systems reviewed AsieduDevelopmentHub/SentraCore

SentraCore is a local system behavior intelligence platform for multiOS that continuously analyzes system telemetry to understand performance behavior.

What a real review looks like

OziGi is more substantial than the usual “AI content generator” wrapper. The product has a clear thesis: founders, DevRel teams, and technical builders usually have strong raw material but lose their voice when generic AI tools turn that material into polished sludge. …
@CrisisCore-Systems reviewed Ozigi-app/OziGi

Source leads, run outreach, and publish content that sounds like you — not like a chatbot. One tool, one voice, one pipeline.

What a real review looks like

Weathr is one of those rare terminal projects where the aesthetic idea and the practical utility actually reinforce each other. It is not just a weather CLI that prints a forecast, and it is not just ASCII art for novelty. …
@CrisisCore-Systems reviewed Veirt/weathr

A terminal weather app with ASCII animations driven by real-time weather data.

Submit. Review. Earn. Boost.

A credit economy where contribution is the only path to visibility.

01

Submit your repo for free

Any active public GitHub repo qualifies. Add a tagline. Your project goes live on the leaderboard immediately. No approval queue. No card.

See the board

02

Write one peer review

Pick a repo you've used or have strong opinions on. Write 800 characters: what it does, who it's for, what could improve. The maintainer has 48 hours to dispute low-effort or off-topic submissions. After that the review goes public and you earn 10 credits.

03

Spend credits on visibility (or skip them)

Use earned credits to pin your repo at the top of the feed or take a Featured spotlight. Boosts also work in cash, from $2. The leaderboard itself is always free.

See boost options

Submit

free

Review others

800+ chars

48h window

dispute period

+10 credits

when released

Boost

optional

Worked example. Review 2 repos this week → 48h windows close → earn 20 credits → run a 20-credit leaderboard boost. Or skip reviewing and pay $2. Full credit math →

How we keep this honest

The credit economy only works if reviews are real. Four guardrails make that the default, not the exception.

  • 48-hour dispute window

    Reviews don't go live, and credits don't unlock, until 48 hours after submission. The reviewed maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text and stop both from happening.

  • GitHub-only sign-in

    Every reviewer is tied to a public GitHub developer profile. No anonymous accounts, no email-only signups, no throwaway identities behind reviews.

  • No self-dealing

    You cannot review your own repos. You cannot review the same repo twice. Boost purchases are visible on the leaderboard so paid placement is always identifiable.

  • Deterministic ranking

    The Top sort follows a published formula: peer reviews, star growth since submission, and optional boosts capped at 2x. No hidden engagement model. Same inputs, same order, for everyone.

Read the full moderation policy →·Ranking rules·Content policy

Open-source repo leaderboard

Full leaderboard →
How is this ranked?
  1. 151PasateArtem
    email-safeLive

    Tailwind CSS + ESLint tools for email-safe HTML. AI-maintained compatibility matrix.

    JavaScript1
  2. 152thejaycampbell
    jarvis-skeleton

    A template to build your own AI operating system.

    JavaScript1
  3. 153thejaycampbell
    blair

    Agentic AI Chief Marketing Officer for solopreneurs who need help with growth marketing and building their brand.

    TypeScript1
  4. 154Isha-saleem
    Codeforces_Problemset_Suite

    This is a simple terminal project. I really like competitive programming, so I wanted to group y recent solved Codeforces solutions into a single C++ file that

    C++0
  5. 155Shushino
    Voice_DiaryLive

    A private, encrypted voice and text diary app for Android. Write entries, record your thoughts, track your mood, and reflect on your journey — all stored secure

    Kotlin0
  6. 156Mrinmay-007
    Final_yrLive

    made rest api for ml models and application

    Python0
  7. 157Mohit125802T
    Python-CreationsLive

    Just, my creations using python programming language.

    Python0

Common questions

Why the 48-hour delay before a review is released?

The maintainer can dispute a review that breaks the rules during the window. If there is no dispute, the review is published, credits are granted, and the review is visible to everyone. That keeps the review pool higher quality.

How do you prevent fake reviews and self-dealing?

Sign-in is GitHub-only, so every reviewer is tied to a public developer profile. You cannot review your own repos. Reviews must clear 800 characters before submission. Every review enters a 48-hour dispute window where the maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text. Disputed reviews don't release and the reviewer earns no credits. See our content policy for full rules.

What stops paid boosts from buying #1?

Boosts are a multiplier on your organic score, capped at 2x. A repo with zero reviews scores zero regardless of boosts. A well-reviewed repo always beats a heavily-boosted one. See /rules for the full formula.

What is a credit?

A credit is a point you earn by writing reviews and spend on boosts. New accounts start with 25 free credits. Write an 800-character review and earn 10 more when it's released after the 48-hour dispute window.

Is it free to list my repo?

Yes. Submitting your repo and appearing on the leaderboard costs nothing. You only pay when you want extra visibility. Leaderboard boosts start at $2.

More questions? See the full FAQ →

157

repos listed

142

reviews published

138

developers

Who built this

Jay Campbell GitHub avatar

Jay Campbell

@thejaycampbell·Founder, RepoRanker

I built RepoRanker because the vibe-coding wave produced thousands of new builders shipping in public, and there was nowhere to get substantive peer feedback on the actual work. GitHub is public but passive. Launch communities reward the moment, not the repo. RepoRanker is the place where critiques are earned, not gamed: reviewing another project earns you credits, so the feedback is real and the community has skin in the game.

More about RepoRanker →·info@reporanker.com

Ship it. Then prove it.

60 seconds to submit. Zero approval queue. Or start by reviewing a project you already know and earn credits toward your own boost. See pricing for optional visibility options.

Content & review policy

Submit your repo