ArseniiBuhaiev/ua-g2p
Credits + grant $5LibraryA robust rule-based G2P (Grapheme-to-Phoneme) tool designed specifically for the Ukrainian language.
This is a robust G2P tool for representing Ukrainian orthographic text in three different types of transcription, handling abbreviations, pausation, clitics and stress ambiguity.
No GitHub topics on this repo.
- Python100.0%
Placement
Every place and its price$5
$4.60 from converted credits; $0.40 granted by RepoRanker. Credits and grants are not card payments. This placement does not expire. Its rank holds until another repo spends more, and then this one moves down, never off. Taking the top of the board from here costs $13.
1 Review
ua-g2p is a promising, tightly scoped Python library for Ukrainian grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. I like that it does not try to be a generic multilingual G2P wrapper; the rules, preprocessing, stress handling, clitic logic, and IPA/phonetic/phonematic outputs are clearly aimed at Ukrainian TTS and linguistic workflows. The public API is also pleasantly small: from ua_g2p import ProcessorG2P is easy to understand, and the README gives a useful first example with accentor="hybrid" and mode="ipa". The acknowledgements are well placed too, since the project builds on existing Ukrainian tokenization and stress tools instead of hiding those dependencies.
The main thing I would improve before expecting outside adoption is packaging and verification. setup.py installs num2words, ukrainian_word_stress, ua_text_stressifier, and tokenize_uk, but the preprocessor imports english_g2p, and requirements.txt includes extra dependencies such as spacy that are not reflected in the install metadata. A user installing with the README command may hit missing imports or model setup friction. The approbation folder is a good sign because it shows the author has started validating preprocessing behavior, and the included clitics report with 92.09% word accuracy is exactly the kind of evidence this project should surface. I would turn that into a normal test suite, add a CI workflow, and document how to reproduce the report.
The rule configuration is substantial and domain-specific, which is the repository’s strongest asset. To make it easier to maintain, I would add comments or references for the trickier assimilation and stress rules, plus a few before/after examples for edge cases such as abbreviations, English input, punctuation pauses, enclitics, and proclitics. The Creative Commons BY-NC license may also discourage code reuse in commercial TTS/NLP projects, so it would be worth clarifying whether that restriction is intentional for both code and data. Overall, this is a useful early-stage Ukrainian NLP tool with a clear niche; tightening install reliability, tests, and documentation would make it much easier for researchers and speech developers to trust.
