Free for open-source maintainers
The peer-review leaderboard for open-source GitHub repos.
Submit your repo and collect 800+ character peer reviews from GitHub-verified developers. The leaderboard follows published rules. No black-box algorithm. No launch-day window.
Persistent peer review, not launch-day hype
Product Hunt rewards the moment. RepoRanker rewards the work. Reviews live on the repo page permanently, rankings follow rules you can read, and feedback is written by developers who have GitHub skin in the game.
Product Hunt
RepoRanker ✓
Built for
Product launches (any category)
Open-source GitHub repos only
Feedback format
Upvotes + short comments
800+ character written reviews
Ranking logic
Launch-day vote momentum
Reviews + star momentum, formula published
Feedback lifespan
Fades after launch day
Permanent on every repo page
Reviewer identity
Any account
GitHub-verified, no self-review
Full comparison: vs Product Hunt, GitHub Trending & Awesome lists →
Real reviews from the community
What an 800-character review actually looks like
What a real review looks like
“Kore brings type-safe Kotlin DSLs to Minecraft Java datapack development. It generates folders, ZIPs, or mod-loader JARs and covers commands, functions, recipes, NBT builders, gameplay abstractions, rendering helpers, scheduling, scoreboard utilities, and experimental bindings for existing packs. …
What a real review looks like
“Kuku is a local-first Markdown workspace for macOS that layers wiki links, backlinks, search, graphs, AI editing, Second Brain workflows, and encrypted synchronization over ordinary files. Keeping notes compatible with Git, Vim, Obsidian, and other Markdown tools protects portability. …
Plain files, personal wiki, Second Brain workflows, AI diffs, and encrypted sync.
What a real review looks like
“Ultimate Menu is a community Lua menu for GTA Online modding environments, offering recovery features, money tools, heist editing, and other controls through ModestMenu and YimMenu variants. The repository is candid about platform status, including a final ModestMenu update, active Legacy support, and the incomplete En …
A powerful menu script featuring advanced recovery options, money tools, a Heist Editor, and much more.
Submit. Review. Earn. Boost.
A credit economy where contribution is the only path to visibility.
Submit your repo for free
Any active public GitHub repo qualifies. Add a tagline. Your project goes live on the leaderboard immediately. No approval queue. No card.
Write one peer review
Pick a repo you've used or have strong opinions on. Write 800 characters: what it does, who it's for, what could improve. The maintainer has 48 hours to dispute low-effort or off-topic submissions. After that the review goes public and you earn 10 credits.
Spend credits on visibility (or skip them)
Use earned credits to pin your repo at the top of the feed or take a Featured spotlight. Boosts also work in cash, from $2. The leaderboard itself is always free.
Submit
free
Review others
800+ chars
48h window
dispute period
+10 credits
when released
Boost
optional
Worked example. Review 2 repos this week → 48h windows close → earn 20 credits → run a 20-credit leaderboard boost. Or skip reviewing and pay $2. Full credit math →
How we keep this honest
The credit economy only works if reviews are real. Four guardrails make that the default, not the exception.
48-hour dispute window
Reviews don't go live, and credits don't unlock, until 48 hours after submission. The reviewed maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text and stop both from happening.
GitHub-only sign-in
Every reviewer is tied to a public GitHub developer profile. No anonymous accounts, no email-only signups, no throwaway identities behind reviews.
No self-dealing
You cannot review your own repos. You cannot review the same repo twice. Boost purchases are visible on the leaderboard so paid placement is always identifiable.
Deterministic ranking
The Top sort follows a published formula: peer reviews, star growth since submission, and optional boosts capped at 2x. No hidden engagement model. Same inputs, same order, for everyone.
Read the full moderation policy →·Ranking rules·Content policy
Open-source repo leaderboard
Full leaderboard →- 1brigadeLive
Brigade - Your personal intelligence, built enterprise-grade
TypeScript★5721 reviews - 2tura
Tura: 16.7% better performance, 77.5% fewer rounds — a local, open-source coding agent that understands repositories before editing.
Rust★5201 reviews - 3mouziLive
> Your downloads, tamed.
Rust★7604 reviews - 4WaifuX
|------|:----:|------|
Swift★1.2k3 reviews - 5BitFun
Open-source Rust desktop AI agent with coding workflows, Mini Apps, and self-hosted device sync.
Rust★1.6k0 reviews - 6scc
A tool similar to cloc, sloccount and tokei. For counting the lines of code, blank lines, comment lines, and physical lines of source code in many programming l
Go★8.6k2 reviews - 7linkSponsored
Local, source-backed memory for LLM agents.
Python★1472 reviews - 8eva
一个极简的单python文件智能体，无第三方依赖、随处运行。 <A minimalist AI agent in a single Python file – no third‑party dependencies, runs anywhere.>
Python★3901 reviews - 9weathrLive
A terminal weather app with ASCII animations driven by real-time weather data.
Rust★3.0k3 reviews - 10MudBlazor
Build stunning, interactive web applications with MudBlazor — the open-source Material Design library for Blazor.
C#★10.5k2 reviews - 11flowentLive
A workflow orchestration platform for multi-agent collaboration.
TypeScript★3231 reviews - 12mhabit
Table Habit is an app that helps you establish and track your micro habits.
Dart★1.4k2 reviews - 13ZephyrLive
A modern, lightweight, and secure Mihomo / Clash Meta GUI client built with Tauri and Rust.
JavaScript★6682 reviews - 14ctxLive
> Knowledge store with weighted 4-way RRF retrieval, multi-tenant scope isolation, multi-dimensional cyclic temporal gravity, and autonomous cross-referencing.
Go★352 reviews - 15oppiaLive
Oppia is an online learning tool that enables anyone to easily create and share interactive activities (called 'explorations'). These activities simulate a one-
Python★6.8k1 reviews - 16aimeos
Integrated online shop based on Laravel and the Aimeos e-commerce framework for ultra-fast online shops, scalable marketplaces, complex B2B applications
JavaScript★5.4k2 reviews - 17kuku
Plain files, personal wiki, Second Brain workflows, AI diffs, and encrypted sync.
Rust★2042 reviews - 18google-surf-mcpLive
Google search MCP. One MCP replaces search + fetch + academic-paper extractor.
TypeScript★2771 reviews - 19pagible
Easy, flexible and powerful cloud-native Laravel CMS package powered by AI with JSON:API, GraphQL API, templates, and themes
PHP★5752 reviews - 20intelli-shell
IntelliShell is a powerful command template and snippet manager for your shell.
Rust★1.3k3 reviews - 21telegoLive
Telego is a Telegram Bot API library for Golang with full API implementation (one-to-one)
Go★1.1k2 reviews - 22cs
Ever searched for authenticate and gotten 200 results from config files, comments, and test stubs before finding the actual implementation? cs fixes that.
Go★1.1k2 reviews - 23svocsLive
Make beautiful docs with Svelte & Markdown
Svelte★151 reviews - 24aural-ossLive
Self-hostable AI interviews over voice, chat, and video with adaptive follow-ups and structured scoring.
TypeScript★1870 reviews - 25aimeos-laravel
Laravel ecommerce package for ultra fast online shops, scalable marketplaces, complex B2B applications and #gigacommerce :star: Star us on GitHub 😀
PHP★8.7k2 reviews
Common questions
Why the 48-hour delay before a review is released?
The maintainer can dispute a review that breaks the rules during the window. If there is no dispute, the review is published, credits are granted, and the review is visible to everyone. That keeps the review pool higher quality.
How do you prevent fake reviews and self-dealing?
Sign-in is GitHub-only, so every reviewer is tied to a public developer profile. You cannot review your own repos. Reviews must clear 800 characters before submission. Every review enters a 48-hour dispute window where the maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text. Disputed reviews don't release and the reviewer earns no credits. See our content policy for full rules.
What stops paid boosts from buying #1?
Boosts are a multiplier on your organic score, capped at 2x. A repo with zero reviews scores zero regardless of boosts. A well-reviewed repo always beats a heavily-boosted one. See /rules for the full formula.
What is a credit?
A credit is a point you earn by writing reviews and spend on boosts. New accounts start with 25 free credits. Write an 800-character review and earn 10 more when it's released after the 48-hour dispute window.
Is it free to list my repo?
Yes. Submitting your repo and appearing on the leaderboard costs nothing. You only pay when you want extra visibility. Leaderboard boosts start at $2.
More questions? See the full FAQ →
270
repos listed
223
reviews published
225
developers
Who built this
Jay Campbell
@thejaycampbell·Founder, RepoRanker
I built RepoRanker because the vibe-coding wave produced thousands of new builders shipping in public, and there was nowhere to get substantive peer feedback on the actual work. GitHub is public but passive. Launch communities reward the moment, not the repo. RepoRanker is the place where critiques are earned, not gamed: reviewing another project earns you credits, so the feedback is real and the community has skin in the game.
Ship it. Then prove it.
60 seconds to submit. Zero approval queue. Or start by reviewing a project you already know and earn credits toward your own boost. See pricing for optional visibility options.