rsalmei/alive-progress
Credits + grant $6A new kind of Progress Bar, with real-time throughput, ETA, and very cool animations!
A new kind of Progress Bar, with real-time throughput, ETA, and very cool animations!
- Python99.6%
- Just0.4%
Placement
Every place and its price$6
$5.60 from converted credits; $0.40 granted by RepoRanker. Credits and grants are not card payments. This placement does not expire. Its rank holds until another repo spends more, and then this one moves down, never off. Taking the top of the board from here costs $12.
1 Review
alive-progress is a polished and unusually thoughtful Python terminal progress-bar project. The value proposition is clear: it is not just a tqdm alternative, but a richer terminal feedback system with animated spinners, real-time throughput, ETA smoothing, print/logging integration, overflow/underflow detection, pause/resume-oriented behavior, and extensive customization. The README is a major strength: it shows demos, installation, core usage, advanced modes, styling, configuration, Jupyter/PyCharm notes, and Python EOL guidance. That makes the project approachable for first-time users while still documenting deeper features for power users.
The repository also shows strong maintenance signals. It has about 6.3k stars, 232 forks, MIT licensing, Python-dominant code, a tests/ directory, noxfile.py test automation across Python 3.9-3.13, package metadata for Python 3.9-3.14, and recent CI/activity around version 3.3.0, typing support, Python 3.14, and dependency maintenance. The open issues and PRs are manageable in size, and several are feature requests or edge-case terminal compatibility reports rather than signs of instability.
The biggest improvement opportunity is contributor onboarding. The README is excellent for users, but a short CONTRIBUTING.md with local setup, test commands, release expectations, style rules, and guidance for terminal-rendering tests would lower the barrier for outside contributors. I would also consider moving some advanced README sections into docs pages so the front page stays easier to scan. Finally, since issue #306 and PR #311 point to typing concerns, tightening public type annotations and adding type-checking to CI would be a high-impact next step for a package used inside other developers’ tooling.
