Free for open-source maintainers

The peer-review leaderboard for open-source GitHub repos.

Submit your repo and collect 800+ character peer reviews from GitHub-verified developers. The leaderboard follows published rules. No black-box algorithm. No launch-day window.

Top repos right now

spinabot/brigadeTypeScript★ 3.1k

jipika/WaifuXSwift★ 1.3k

hsr88/mouziAstro★ 829

Submit your repofreeLive in 60 seconds. No card. No waitlist.

Browse repos to reviewEarn 10 credits per review. No sign-in to browse.

Persistent peer review, not launch-day hype

Product Hunt rewards the moment. RepoRanker rewards the work. Reviews live on the repo page permanently, rankings follow rules you can read, and feedback is written by developers who have GitHub skin in the game.

Product Hunt

RepoRanker ✓

Built for

Product launches (any category)

Open-source GitHub repos only

Feedback format

Upvotes + short comments

800+ character written reviews

Ranking logic

Launch-day vote momentum

Reviews + star momentum, formula published

Feedback lifespan

Fades after launch day

Permanent on every repo page

Reviewer identity

Any account

GitHub-verified, no self-review

Full comparison: vs Product Hunt, GitHub Trending & Awesome lists →

Real reviews from the community

What an 800-character review actually looks like

What a real review looks like

“Hackeroom is a thoughtful attempt to turn Claude Code into a visible, configurable development team. Members can have separate roles, models, skills, budgets, and permission modes, while a deterministic orchestrator controls planning, review, coding, testing, auditing, and deployment. …

@thejaycampbell reviewed SinghAbhinav04/dev-house

Give Claude Code a dev team.

2,484 charsRead full review →

What a real review looks like

“Upload-to-Web3 provides a focused Apify Actor for downloading files from supplied URLs and uploading them to Pinata. The implementation supports public IPFS uploads and private Pinata storage, records the CID and resulting URL, and saves an individual success or error result for each file. …

@thejaycampbell reviewed onescales/Upload-to-Web3

Upload to Web3 is an Apify app that uploads files to IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) using the Pinata API. Upload any type of file - images, PDFs, documents,

2,198 charsRead full review →

What a real review looks like

“This project offers a practical, dependency-free way to import calendar data into Google Sheets without handing an ICS file to a third-party conversion service. The Apps Script adds a clear spreadsheet menu, opens a simple upload dialog, unfolds continued ICS lines, extracts common event fields, captures attendees, sup …

@thejaycampbell reviewed onescales/google-calendar-ics-to-google-sheets

Simple steps to export Google Calendar, get a .ics file and import it to Google sheets.

2,460 charsRead full review →

Submit. Review. Earn. Boost.

A credit economy where contribution is the only path to visibility.

Submit your repo for free

Any active public GitHub repo qualifies. Add a tagline. Your project goes live on the leaderboard immediately. No approval queue. No card.

See the board →

Write one peer review

Pick a repo you've used or have strong opinions on. Write 800 characters: what it does, who it's for, what could improve. The maintainer has 48 hours to dispute low-effort or off-topic submissions. After that the review goes public and you earn 10 credits.

Spend credits on visibility (or skip them)

Use earned credits to pin your repo at the top of the feed or take a Featured spotlight. Boosts also work in cash, from $2. The leaderboard itself is always free.

See boost options →

Submit

free

Review others

800+ chars

48h window

dispute period

+10 credits

when released

Boost

optional

Worked example. Review 2 repos this week → 48h windows close → earn 20 credits → run a 20-credit leaderboard boost. Or skip reviewing and pay $2. Full credit math →

How we keep this honest

The credit economy only works if reviews are real. Four guardrails make that the default, not the exception.

48-hour dispute window
Reviews don't go live, and credits don't unlock, until 48 hours after submission. The reviewed maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text and stop both from happening.
GitHub-only sign-in
Every reviewer is tied to a public GitHub developer profile. No anonymous accounts, no email-only signups, no throwaway identities behind reviews.
No self-dealing
You cannot review your own repos. You cannot review the same repo twice. Boost purchases are visible on the leaderboard so paid placement is always identifiable.
Deterministic ranking
The Top sort follows a published formula: peer reviews, star growth since submission, and optional boosts capped at 2x. No hidden engagement model. Same inputs, same order, for everyone.

Read the full moderation policy →·Ranking rules·Content policy

Featured3 spots open

Coming soon

The first thing every developer sees — above the leaderboard

Up to 3 projects hold a spotlight at once. Each runs for 48 hours and sits above all ranked results. Activate with review credits or a direct purchase.

✦

Spot 1

✦

Spot 2

✦

Spot 3

Coming soon

Open-source repo leaderboard

Full leaderboard →

By language:Python TypeScript JavaScript Rust HTML C++Shell Java Go PHP C Kotlin Swift C#

By type:Application139 Library42 CLI28 Other26 DevOps4

Today Week Month Year All Time

Sort:

How is this ranked?

Common questions

Why the 48-hour delay before a review is released?

The maintainer can dispute a review that breaks the rules during the window. If there is no dispute, the review is published, credits are granted, and the review is visible to everyone. That keeps the review pool higher quality.

How do you prevent fake reviews and self-dealing?

Sign-in is GitHub-only, so every reviewer is tied to a public developer profile. You cannot review your own repos. Reviews must clear 800 characters before submission. Every review enters a 48-hour dispute window where the maintainer can flag low-effort or dishonest text. Disputed reviews don't release and the reviewer earns no credits. See our content policy for full rules.

What stops paid boosts from buying #1?

Boosts are a multiplier on your organic score, capped at 2x. A repo with zero reviews scores zero regardless of boosts. A well-reviewed repo always beats a heavily-boosted one. See /rules for the full formula.

What is a credit?

A credit is a point you earn by writing reviews and spend on boosts. New accounts start with 25 free credits. Write an 800-character review and earn 10 more when it's released after the 48-hour dispute window.

Is it free to list my repo?

Yes. Submitting your repo and appearing on the leaderboard costs nothing. You only pay when you want extra visibility. Leaderboard boosts start at $2.

Jay Campbell

@thejaycampbell·Founder, RepoRanker

I built RepoRanker because the vibe-coding wave produced thousands of new builders shipping in public, and there was nowhere to get substantive peer feedback on the actual work. GitHub is public but passive. Launch communities reward the moment, not the repo. RepoRanker is the place where critiques are earned, not gamed: reviewing another project earns you credits, so the feedback is real and the community has skin in the game.

More about RepoRanker →·info@reporanker.com

Ship it. Then prove it.

60 seconds to submit. Zero approval queue. Or start by reviewing a project you already know and earn credits toward your own boost. See pricing for optional visibility options.

Submit your repofree Browse repos to review →

Content & review policy