Skip to content
RepoRanker
wolfstar-project

wolfstar-project/wolfstar

Placed · $4.20Live in production

A powerful bot designed to enhance your server experience.

A multipurpose Discord Bot designed to carry out most of your server's needs with great performance and stability. Fork of https://github.com/skyra-project/skyra

3 2TypeScriptPush 8h agoListed 3mo ago11 open issuesApache-2.0

wolfstar.rocks

botdiscorddiscord-botsdiscord-jsdiscordjsmoderationsapphire
  • TypeScript99.4%
  • JavaScript0.4%
  • Dockerfile0.1%
  • PowerShell0.1%
  • Shell0.0%
View on GitHub

$4.20

Paid so far for this repo's place on the board. The place is permanent: it holds until another repo spends more, and then this one moves down, never off. Taking the top of the board from here costs $13.80.

Report a problem

1 Review

WolfStar feels like a serious Discord bot codebase rather than a small command collection. The repo is organized around a TypeScript/Sapphire stack, with commands split into clear domains like Admin, Moderation, Management, Tools, Twitch, Games, and System, which makes the scope easy to understand from the tree. The README does a good job positioning the bot around moderation, role management, multilingual support, logging, and server admin workflows, and it is helpful that it links the official site, invite, support server, translation flow, license, and contribution/community documents. The project also has stronger engineering hygiene than many bot repos: Prisma is present for persistence, Vitest is wired in, CI runs lint/build/tests with coverage upload, actions are pinned by commit SHA, and Renovate is actively tracking dependency updates.

The biggest adoption gap is that the README is more product-facing than operator-facing. Since the maintainers discourage self-hosting, that stance is understandable, but contributors still need a tighter path from “clone repo” to “run a local bot safely.” I’d expand the development docs with a concrete environment variable template, Discord app setup notes, database/bootstrap steps, and a short architecture map for where moderation actions, scheduled tasks, listeners, API routes, and i18n live. I would also be careful with the committed src/.env-style files: even if they are placeholders, naming them as templates or moving examples to .env.example would reduce confusion and security anxiety for reviewers. Public traction is still small, with 3 stars and 3 forks, but the 290 commits, Apache-2.0 license, CI/code scanning workflows, privacy/terms files, and active dependency automation suggest a project with real maintenance discipline and a clear niche.