Skip to content
RepoRanker
BashhScriptKid

BashhScriptKid/bash-framehead

Credits + grant $5Library

A framework for Bash — a runtime standard library with a comprehensive (and frankly ridiculous) set of helpers using C++ styled pseudo namespaces

bash::framehead is a fairly opinionated Bash framework with pseudo-namespacing, carrying comprehensive (and ridiculous) set of helpers

★0⑂ 1ShellPush 21d agoListed 4mo agoAGPL-3.0

No GitHub topics on this repo.

  • Shell99.2%
  • C0.4%
  • CSS0.4%
  • Makefile0.0%
View on GitHub

$5

$4.60 from converted credits; $0.40 granted by RepoRanker. Credits and grants are not card payments. This placement does not expire. Its rank holds until another repo spends more, and then this one moves down, never off. Taking the top of the board from here costs $13.

Report a problem

1 Review

bash-framehead is a surprisingly ambitious Bash standard-library project, and the strongest part is that it treats Bash utilities as a real distributable library rather than a pile of snippets. The module::function convention is easy to scan, and the split between strict core modules in src/ and looser optional extensions in ext/ is a good design choice. I especially liked the compiler story in main.sh: users can build one sourceable file, compile extensions, or use compile_bare to emit only the reachable functions for a specific namespace such as string::trim or json::*. That makes the project more practical than “source this giant helper file” usually sounds.

The documentation is also much better than I expected for a young repo. The README explains the tradeoffs clearly, docs/guides/getting-started.md gives a real first script, docs/guides/contributing.md explains naming and module-boundary rules, and docs/api/ has per-function reference pages. The project also has a serious local test harness in tools/tester.sh, with about 1,500 test::... definitions, plus extension-level tests under directories like ext/json, ext/csv, ext/toml, ext/http-server, and ext/wav. That gives maintainers a decent foundation for refactoring such a wide API surface.

The main thing I would tighten before pushing this harder is release and documentation consistency. The README currently describes 18 modules and around 1,117 API definitions, while src/ contains 22 core shell files and docs/api/index.md says about 1,300 functions across 21 modules. The release asset is also named bash-framehead.sh, while the getting-started guide tells users to download bash_framehead.sh, so a copy-paste install may fail. I also did not see a .github directory or hosted CI, which matters for a Bash library because behavior depends heavily on Bash version, GNU/BSD utilities, Linux device files, and optional tools. A GitHub Actions matrix running the existing tester on Ubuntu, plus ShellCheck through dry_compile, would make the “tested” claim much easier to trust. Overall, this is a useful and distinctive project with real engineering effort behind it; the next adoption win is making the public surface feel as dependable as the codebase is ambitious.

BashhScriptKid

Hello! Appreciate the review. The README is getting outdated at this point so I pretty much plan on getting rid of the statistics embedded in there (the one in direct `./main.sh stat <file>` or docs/ are way more accurate as I explicitly steer models regularly to do update chores in those areas)

BashhScriptKid

Oh and the name is a dash instead of :: because filenames are strict. The releases are manual by me (I decide when to launch — it's simple to do anyway) And as API expands, it also needs cross OS testing (especially in kernel.sh) which I cannot figure out yet But the tester is already included in tools/ and can be run by `./main.sh test`